Comments
paul.nowak wrote: Matt, thanks for the comments. I made an error on the version of Plone. It's 2.5 Plone running on Zope 2.9x. In regards to the additional products, we have a skin installed and we have a product that we had custom developed for us that connects to a PostgreSQL database. We've looked at slow PostgreSQL queries causing problems and have not been able to find an issue. We've also tested for the case where the PostgreSQL server is down and have not been able to create an issue. We therefor...
Cloud Computing
Conference & Expo
November 2-4, 2009 NYC
Register Today and SAVE !..

SYS-CON.TV
i-Technology Viewpoint: Does Adobe Flash Need Re-Branding?
"I do not work for Adobe, but I like their Flex technology, and often play a role of a volunteer Flex evangelist..."

In my opinion, one of the Adobe’s most important goals in regards to adoption of Flash-related technologies is to get attention of the  enterprise architects and developers.

I often speak about Flex in front of the Java audiences. At the time of this writing I do not work for Adobe, but I like their  Flex technology, and often play a role of a volunteer Flex evangelist. During such meetings I’ve  noticed that  the vast majority of the enterprise developers assumes that Flash is useful only for creating and playing  animations, splash intro screens or online ads. They do not  see it as a serious tool applicable for running GUI of  enterprise Web applications. The press speaks about  Flash Player, Flash Animation Engine, Flash media authoring tool…  Not too many people realize that Flash is a virtual machine, that runs literally on each available platform, has a small footprint and runs compiled program files. These files can be produced by pure Flash developers, by developers that use Flex, or by people using Open Laszlo. I’m sure there might be some other less known tools that can also generate these .swf files for Flash virtual machine.

To change this perception, Adobe should modify the name of the Flash Player to something like Flash VM or Flash Player VM. Their marketing department should find a way to add  these two letters to all product brochures and other advertisements. It won’t happen overnight, but people need to start getting used to the fact that it’s not a toy, but a VM  that plays a role similar to Java, offers an easy integration with Java, and is also a cross-platform programming environment.

posted Sunday, 11 June 2006
tags:      

About Yakov Fain
Yakov Fain is a Managing Director of Farata Systems, consulting, training and product company. He has authored several Java books, dozens of technical articles. SYS-CON Books released his latest co-authored book , Rich Internet Applications with Adobe Flex and Java: Secrets of the Masters in Spring 2007. Sun Microsystems has nominated and awarded Yakov with the title Java Champion. He leads the Princeton Java Users Group. He is an Adobe Certified Flex Instructor. Currently Yakov works on the book for O'Reilly "Enterprise Application Development with Flex". He twits at twitter.com/yfain.

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Register | Sign-in

Reader Feedback: Page 1 of 1

I could not agree with the author on the "Flex" product. I am both a Java and Flash programmer for years. I have develop software using Flex. The result is very disappointing. That product is handicapped that it could not acheive the same effect of Flash even with the same code. I like Flash but I really hate Flex. For any serious developer, I would advice you to use Flash directly, Java or even .Net (Expression) to replace Flex. Seriously.

I don't think its really necessary to change the consumer portion of the framework just to change the developer perceptions. The developers will read about the changes in Flash or see them in conventions and bring them back to their respective businesses. We don't need to confuse the downloading public with the details of our world. Word has a way of getting around. Our team is already contemplating a complete rewrite of our site in Flash and it hasn't even been released yet.

With the emerging of the Flash Platform, it should be re-brand the Flash Player to something like Flash VM or Flash Engine to better describe the potential power of Flash and Flex technologies.
I am expecting the launch of Apollo project and hence I think it is necessary to re-brand the Flash Player to match the upcoming universal client.

As a Linux user, Flash is the bane of my life. Not because Flash isn't supported on Linux, but because it IS supported, and supported very very badly. When I'm surfing the web on my home computer if I come to a site that has Flash more than half the time the browser crashes. You cannot imagine how frustrating this is. To give just ONE example my wife wants to print off recipes from the Food Network site, which has Flash advertisements. What I have to do to accomplish this in Linux is to use dillo, a very minimal browser that does not support Flash, JavaScript, or printing. I use dillo to open the printer-friendly version of the recipe, then copy that URL to Mozilla and print it out.

I have tried uninstalling Flash and installing the latest Flash from the website. Basically none of this works. The browser crashes when it encounters Flash. This affects every browser that supports Flash in Linux.

With so many websites using this abomination I now have a home network with a second computer running Windows ME and printer sharing using Samba.

In sumnmary, Flash seems to need debugging more than rebranding.

Many of us already are well aware that Flash is 'not a toy'. In the last 2-3 years the (large) organisation where I work has adopted a 'Java or Flash' policy for writing apps that will be delivered via a browser, with development teams being free to choose the best tool for the job. In 90% of cases Flash is now being chosen and I expect that to rise to closer to 100% in the next year. In short, no rebranding is required, Flash has already won this battle in the minds of many of us.

Many of us already are well aware that Flash is 'not a toy'. In the last 2-3 years the (large) organisation where I work has adopted a 'Java or Flash' policy for writing apps that will be delivered via a browser, with development teams being free to choose the best tool for the job. In 90% of cases Flash is now being chosen and I expect that to rise to closer to 100% in the next year. In short, no rebranding is required, Flash has already won this battle in the minds of many of us.

To change this perception, Adobe should modify the name of the Flash Player to something like Flash VM or Flash Player VM. Their marketing department should find a way to add these two letters to all product brochures and other advertisements. It won't happen overnight, but people need to start getting used to the fact that it's not a toy, but a VM that plays a role similar to Java, offers an easy integration with Java, and is also a cross-platform programming environment.


Your Feedback
Aviao wrote: I could not agree with the author on the "Flex" product. I am both a Java and Flash programmer for years. I have develop software using Flex. The result is very disappointing. That product is handicapped that it could not acheive the same effect of Flash even with the same code. I like Flash but I really hate Flex. For any serious developer, I would advice you to use Flash directly, Java or even .Net (Expression) to replace Flex. Seriously.
ShadoeKnight wrote: I don't think its really necessary to change the consumer portion of the framework just to change the developer perceptions. The developers will read about the changes in Flash or see them in conventions and bring them back to their respective businesses. We don't need to confuse the downloading public with the details of our world. Word has a way of getting around. Our team is already contemplating a complete rewrite of our site in Flash and it hasn't even been released yet.
Dev Lord wrote: With the emerging of the Flash Platform, it should be re-brand the Flash Player to something like Flash VM or Flash Engine to better describe the potential power of Flash and Flex technologies. I am expecting the launch of Apollo project and hence I think it is necessary to re-brand the Flash Player to match the upcoming universal client.
James Simmons wrote: As a Linux user, Flash is the bane of my life. Not because Flash isn't supported on Linux, but because it IS supported, and supported very very badly. When I'm surfing the web on my home computer if I come to a site that has Flash more than half the time the browser crashes. You cannot imagine how frustrating this is. To give just ONE example my wife wants to print off recipes from the Food Network site, which has Flash advertisements. What I have to do to accomplish this in Linux is to use dillo, a very minimal browser that does not support Flash, JavaScript, or printing. I use dillo to open the printer-friendly version of the recipe, then copy that URL to Mozilla and print it out. I have tried uninstalling Flash and installing the latest Flash from the website. Basically none of this works. The browser crashes when it encounters Flash. This affects every browser that suppor...
ark wrote: Many of us already are well aware that Flash is 'not a toy'. In the last 2-3 years the (large) organisation where I work has adopted a 'Java or Flash' policy for writing apps that will be delivered via a browser, with development teams being free to choose the best tool for the job. In 90% of cases Flash is now being chosen and I expect that to rise to closer to 100% in the next year. In short, no rebranding is required, Flash has already won this battle in the minds of many of us.
ark wrote: Many of us already are well aware that Flash is 'not a toy'. In the last 2-3 years the (large) organisation where I work has adopted a 'Java or Flash' policy for writing apps that will be delivered via a browser, with development teams being free to choose the best tool for the job. In 90% of cases Flash is now being chosen and I expect that to rise to closer to 100% in the next year. In short, no rebranding is required, Flash has already won this battle in the minds of many of us.
SYS-CON Australia News Desk wrote: To change this perception, Adobe should modify the name of the Flash Player to something like Flash VM or Flash Player VM. Their marketing department should find a way to add these two letters to all product brochures and other advertisements. It won't happen overnight, but people need to start getting used to the fact that it's not a toy, but a VM that plays a role similar to Java, offers an easy integration with Java, and is also a cross-platform programming environment.
Subscribe to the World's Most Powerful Newsletters
Subscribe to Our Rss Feeds & Get Your SYS-CON News Live!
Click to Add our RSS Feeds to the Service of Your Choice:
Google Reader or Homepage Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe with Bloglines Subscribe in NewsGator Online
myFeedster Add to My AOL Subscribe in Rojo Add 'Hugg' to Newsburst from CNET News.com Kinja Digest View Additional SYS-CON Feeds
Publish Your Article! Please send it to editorial(at)sys-con.com!

Advertise on this site! Contact advertising(at)sys-con.com! 201 802-3021


SYS-CON Featured Whitepapers
ADS BY GOOGLE